Explore policy to ban city investments in corporations that avoid income taxes
In Plain English
The city currently invests public funds in various corporations through its investment portfolio. This proposal would create a new rule preventing the city from investing in any company that has not paid federal income taxes. If approved, the city would also need to sell off any existing investments in tax-avoiding corporations.
Auto-generated summary. Source: official agenda documents.
Votes
Motion to limit debate
2 to 5
Why This Vote Matters
The council rejected an attempt to limit debate on a proposal that would prevent the city from investing in corporations that don't pay federal income taxes. Councilmembers Boozé and Bates wanted to cut short discussion of the investment policy, but the other five members voted to continue the full debate. This procedural vote means the council will have a complete discussion about whether to change how the city invests its public funds, rather than rushing to a decision. The actual policy proposal itself has not yet been voted on.
Auto-generated context. Source: official meeting records.
Directed staff to explore adoption of policy prohibiting City from investing in corporations that have not paid income tax, and requiring City to divest any City funds invested in those corporations
5 to 1
Why This Vote Matters
The council voted with broad support to explore creating a new investment policy that would ban the city from putting public money into companies that don't pay federal income taxes. Under this potential policy, the city would also have to sell any current investments in tax-avoiding corporations. This matters because it could change how the city manages its investment portfolio, though no dollar amounts were specified for how much money might be affected. Councilmember Boozé cast the lone opposing vote, while Councilmember Bates abstained from the decision. The vote only directs staff to research the policy - the council would need to vote again on whether to actually adopt it.
Auto-generated context. Source: official meeting records.
Community Discussion
This discussion was submitted to the City Clerk as part of the public record.
Comments are submitted to the Richmond City Clerk before the meeting. By commenting, you agree to have your name and comment included in the public record.
Similar Discussions
5 related items found by meaning
Add restrictions to city investment policy to avoid funding violence and war
Review proposed laws limiting city contracts and investments with certain companies
Update city investment policy governing how public funds are invested
Approve investment policy that excludes fossil fuel companies
Adopt revised investment policy with social responsibility restrictions
The Story So Far
10 prior discussions on this topic
Accept $4,500 sponsorship from Kaiser Permanente for Park Prescription Day
Rename Cesar Chavez Day to United Farm Workers Day
Pass formal statement opposing U.S. war on Iran and Israeli arms transfers
Update city-wide rules for keeping and destroying old records
Add caste as protected category under city anti-discrimination law
Receive report on city's efforts to protect residents from federal immigration enforcement
Hire Veritone Inc. for police data reporting and video redaction services
Hire T&R Riparian Restore for citywide weed control and vegetation management
Update city-wide records retention and destruction schedules
Hire Dynamo Construction to repair Berth 7 dock for $1,080,650