Hire law firm Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy to file lawsuit on contingent-fee basis

Legal Services AgreementContractsContract

In Plain English

The city plans to file a civil lawsuit but has not disclosed the target or claims. Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy will handle the case and only get paid if the city wins or settles. If approved, the city pays no upfront legal fees but gives the firm a percentage of any money recovered.

Auto-generated summary. Source: official agenda documents.

Votes

Hold Item G-37 over for 30 days

Failed

2 to 5

BBBBMMR

Why This Vote Matters

The council rejected a request to delay a decision on hiring lawyers for an undisclosed lawsuit by 30 days. Vice Mayor Boozé and Councilmember Bates wanted more time to review the legal services agreement with Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, but the majority voted to proceed immediately. Under the proposed contract, the city would pay no upfront legal fees but would give the law firm a percentage of any money recovered if the lawsuit succeeds. The council will now vote on the actual legal services agreement, though the target and claims of the potential lawsuit remain confidential.

Auto-generated context. Source: official meeting records.

Engage Chevron in mediation with understanding that if settlement not reached litigation will be filed, and contract approval take place 30 days from today if no settlement reached

Passed

5 to 2

BBBBMMR

Why This Vote Matters

The council voted 5-2 to require Chevron to enter mediation before the city proceeds with a planned lawsuit, with Councilmembers Bates and Boozé dissenting. If no settlement is reached within 30 days, the city will then approve a contract with the law firm Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy to handle the litigation on a contingency basis, meaning the firm only gets paid if the city wins or settles. The city has not disclosed what claims it intends to pursue against the oil giant. This approach gives Chevron one last chance to resolve the dispute out of court before facing a lawsuit that could cost the company significantly more in legal fees and potential damages.

Auto-generated context. Source: official meeting records.

Second substitute motion to hire the firm on a contingency basis and continue the mediation process

Failed

3 to 3

BBBBMMR

Why This Vote Matters

The council narrowly rejected a plan to hire a law firm for an undisclosed lawsuit where the city would only pay if it wins money. Mayor McLaughlin's motion to hire Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy on a contingency basis failed in a 3-3 tie, with Councilmember Myrick abstaining. Under this arrangement, the city would have paid no upfront legal fees but would give the firm a percentage of any settlement or court award. The rejection means the city will not pursue this particular legal strategy, though the nature of the potential lawsuit remains undisclosed.

Auto-generated context. Source: official meeting records.

End debate

Passed

5 to 2

BBBBMMR

Why This Vote Matters

The council voted 5-2 to end debate on hiring a law firm to handle an undisclosed lawsuit, with Councilmembers Myrick and Rogers wanting more discussion. The city would pay Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy nothing upfront but give them a percentage of any money won through the lawsuit or settlement. This "contingency fee" arrangement means the city takes no financial risk if the case fails, but residents still don't know who the city plans to sue or why. The vote only ended debate on the contract - the actual hiring decision would require a separate vote.

Auto-generated context. Source: official meeting records.

Other motions

Approve the agreement

Failed

Community Discussion

This discussion was submitted to the City Clerk as part of the public record.

Comments are submitted to the Richmond City Clerk before the meeting. By commenting, you agree to have your name and comment included in the public record.