Skip to main content

Charge fees for reviewing and editing audio and video records requests

Police & Community SafetyGovernancePoliceOrdinance

In Plain English

The city currently provides electronic records like police body camera footage for free under the Public Records Act. The new law allows staff to charge fees when they must review, extract portions, or black out sensitive information from audio and video files. Fee amounts are not specified in this proposal.

Auto-generated summary. Source: official agenda documents.

Votes

Motion · Official minutes

Accept staff recommendation with amendment to reduce fee by 25% for immediate family members

Failed

2 aye · 2 nay · 2 abstain · 1 absent

NBTBBCDIEMJMMW

Why This Vote Matters

The proposal to allow the city to charge fees for processing electronic records like police body camera footage failed in a tied vote, with two members absent or abstaining. The ordinance would have let staff charge residents when they need to review, edit, or redact sensitive information from audio and video files requested under the Public Records Act, though no specific fee amounts were set. Councilmembers Bates and Mayor Butt supported the measure with an amendment to give 25% discounts to immediate family members, while Councilmembers Choi and Willis opposed it. The failure is notable given that both Choi and Willis almost always support governance measures, suggesting significant concerns about the proposal.

Auto-generated context based on official minutes.

Motions without individual roll-call records

Motion · Official minutes

Accept staff recommendation with amendment to provide fee waiver for anyone directly related to victim in complaint: mother, father, brother, sister, son, daughter, husband or wife

Failed

Motion · Official minutes

Accept staff recommendation as presented

Failed