Charge fees for reviewing and editing audio and video records requests
In Plain English
The city currently provides electronic records like police body camera footage for free under the Public Records Act. The new law allows staff to charge fees when they must review, extract portions, or black out sensitive information from audio and video files. Fee amounts are not specified in this proposal.
Auto-generated summary. Source: official agenda documents.
Votes
Accept staff recommendation with amendment to reduce fee by 25% for immediate family members
2 to 2
Why This Vote Matters
The proposal to allow the city to charge fees for processing electronic records like police body camera footage failed in a tied vote, with two members absent or abstaining. The ordinance would have let staff charge residents when they need to review, edit, or redact sensitive information from audio and video files requested under the Public Records Act, though no specific fee amounts were set. Councilmembers Bates and Mayor Butt supported the measure with an amendment to give 25% discounts to immediate family members, while Councilmembers Choi and Willis opposed it. The failure is notable given that both Choi and Willis almost always support governance measures, suggesting significant concerns about the proposal.
Auto-generated context. Source: official meeting records.
Other motions
Accept staff recommendation with amendment to provide fee waiver for anyone directly related to victim in complaint: mother, father, brother, sister, son, daughter, husband or wife
FailedAccept staff recommendation as presented
FailedSimilar Discussions
5 related items found by meaning
Set fees for electronic public records requests
Introduce law to charge fees for audio and video public records
Amend Citizens Police Review Commission law to comply with state transparency rules
Amend Citizens Police Review Commission law to comply with state transparency rules
Approve $25,000 contract with SOFTFILE for police digital archiving services
The Story So Far
2 prior discussions on this topic
Richmond Government Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics Act (Richmond GATE Act) Placing a Ballot Initiative on the November 2026 Ballot to Adopt an Ordinance that Establishes an Independent Ethics Commission
Richmond Government Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics Act (Richmond GATE Act) Placing a Ballot Initiative on the November 2026 Ballot to Adopt an Ordinance that Establishes an Independent Ethics Commission
Related by category
Align healthy drink rules with Contra Costa County
Hire Veolia to design Nevin and Wilson pipeline realignment
Oppose new coal and petcoke export facilities in the Bay Area
Accept $800,000 more for Richmond Art and Lighting Project
Adopt a Public Lands Policy for city-owned property
Raise Port of Richmond fees 2.9% and add $200 hourly clean air fee
Certify June 2, 2026 primary election results
Support community cleanup plan for United Heckathorn Superfund site