Clarify limits on using city resources for immigration enforcement

Many speakers expressed support for adopting the ICE-free zone amendments as presented, with one specifically reviewing the clean version of the ordinance and urging approval. Several described the amendments as a crucial step to strengthen Richmond's existing sanctuary city policy.

Many speakers described how fear of immigration enforcement prevents residents from accessing city services, visiting community centers and libraries, and fully engaging in civic life. Several emphasized that public spaces should remain places of service and support rather than fear, and that the ordinance would help rebuild trust between immigrant communities and the city.

Several speakers urged the council to pair non-cooperation policies with comprehensive emergency planning, including citywide communication protocols, training, and neighborhood-level preparedness. One speaker expressed concern about the city's readiness for potential federal operations before June 1st, while others emphasized that preparation sends a clear message of welcome and safety to immigrant residents.

Two speakers emphasized the importance of getting the ordinance language right to ensure clear, enforceable policies without loopholes. One noted that other cities across Contra Costa and the Bay Area are reaching out to learn from Richmond's approach, underscoring the need for precise legal drafting.

One speaker argued that the ordinance cannot stop federal immigration enforcement and criticized suggestions that Richmond police would detain ICE agents, predicting federal retaliation and calling the approach politically unwise.