Direct staff to develop a city-wide community benefits policy
In Plain English
The city wants to create rules for when developers must provide community benefits like affordable housing or parks. Staff will gather public input through outreach and 2 council study sessions before presenting the final policy in October 2021. The city will also hire consultants experienced in community benefits agreements to help draft the policy.
Auto-generated summary. Source: official agenda documents.
Votes
Extend the meeting to discuss items I-2 and I-3
5 to 2
Why This Vote Matters
The council voted 5-2 to extend their meeting to discuss creating city-wide rules for when developers must provide community benefits like affordable housing or parks. Council members Demnlus Johnson III and Thomas K. Butt opposed extending the meeting time. This procedural vote allowed the council to move forward with directing staff to develop the policy through public outreach, study sessions, and consultant help, with a final proposal due in October 2021. The actual community benefits policy, once created, would affect how future development projects contribute to the community.
Auto-generated context. Source: official meeting records.
Approve the staff recommendation and direct staff to include in the proposed policy the hiring of local and minority contractors for all major contracts that were $500,000 or more
5 to 1
Why This Vote Matters
The council voted 5-1 to direct staff to create citywide rules requiring developers to provide community benefits like affordable housing or parks, with an added requirement to hire local and minority contractors on major projects over $500,000. Staff will gather public input and hold two council study sessions before presenting the final policy in October 2021, using outside consultants to help draft the rules. This policy would formalize what benefits the city can demand from new developments in exchange for project approvals. Councilmember Thomas K. Butt cast the lone no vote, while Demnlus Johnson III abstained.
Auto-generated context. Source: official meeting records.
Public Comments
2 people commented (2 spoke at the meeting).
Community Discussion
This discussion was submitted to the City Clerk as part of the public record.
Comments are submitted to the Richmond City Clerk before the meeting. By commenting, you agree to have your name and comment included in the public record.
Similar Discussions
5 related items found by meaning
Direct staff to create citywide community benefits policy
Develop city-wide Community Benefits Policy
Receive presentation on draft citywide Community Benefits Policy proposal
Receive update on development of city-wide Community Benefits Policy
Adopt city-wide community benefits policy
The Story So Far
1 prior discussion on this topic
Related by category
Add caste as protected category in city anti-discrimination law
Oppose carbon waste pipeline project through Richmond
Sign agreement with RecycleMore to comply with state food waste recycling law
Oppose carbon waste pipeline project through Richmond neighborhoods
Create new sister city commission to manage relationship with Sebastia, Palestine
Accept $60,000 state grant for Tahoe for All recreation program
Send letter asking governor to create California-Nevada fireworks task force
Support state bill giving fire chiefs authority over school safety during wildfires
Add caste as a protected class in city anti-discrimination laws