Approve development agreement for Campus Bay mixed-use project

Many speakers argued that the proposed cleanup plan is inadequate for the toxic contamination at the former Zeneca/Stauffer Chemical site, calling for Alternative 6 for complete removal of toxins rather than capping them in place. Several speakers cited specific concerns about sea level rise, liquefaction risks, and the inadequacy of bioremediation plans for a Superfund-qualified toxic waste dump.

Many speakers criticized the December 1st public hearing process as inadequate and undemocratic, noting that councilmembers were not allowed to ask questions of proponents and opponents despite assurances they would have that opportunity. Speakers argued this prevented full understanding of the problems associated with the toxic site and called the process unacceptable for such a consequential decision.

Speakers raised concerns about health risks to current and future residents from exposure to carcinogens and toxic chemicals, emphasizing that there may be no safe level for many contaminants. Several speakers noted that maximum contaminant levels are designed for industrial workers, not residents who would be exposed 24/7, and highlighted increased vulnerability of children and pregnant mothers.

Several speakers argued that AstraZeneca, which recently made billions in profits, should bear full financial responsibility for comprehensive site cleanup rather than leaving future homeowners and HOAs with the burden of maintaining toxic site integrity. Speakers called for holding the Fortune 500 company accountable for its 130-year toxic legacy instead of allowing a $30 million settlement.

Several speakers requested delaying approval until the newly elected City Council takes office on January 12, 2021, arguing that Richmond voters have made their voices heard on this matter. Speakers criticized rushing the process before the new council is sworn in.

Speakers emphasized protecting Bay Area wetlands, wildlife including the endangered Ridgway's Rail, and migrating birds from toxic contamination. One speaker referenced RAMSAR convention protocols for protecting marshes and uplands and called the development bad for people, wildlife, and Richmond.

One speaker expressed support for housing development and job creation as important for Richmond's economic diversity and future, while calling for proper cleanup to ensure safe development. The speaker emphasized Richmond's need for affordable housing and the site's potential for creating homes for current and new residents.