Issue additional clarifications for Point Molate housing development proposals
In Plain English
The city is seeking developers for the Point Molate waterfront site and needs to clarify key requirements. The updated proposal instructions will specify rules for affordable housing, maximum unit counts, and infrastructure financing. Developers must also provide shuttle or bus service to connect residents to transit.
Auto-generated summary. Source: official agenda documents.
Votes
Substitute motion to keep the existing request for proposals and send to the original larger list of companies originally contacted, along with a comprehensive Point Molate vision and include the following provisions: request that the master developers respondents incorporate concepts into the alternative plan by proposing that the development contains no housing on Drum Lot 2; includes a mix of affordable housing with goals of 2/3 to be moderate to low income; includes an evacuation plan and a transportation plan that describes approaches to bringing bus services; insure that infrastructure costs are self-funded with no additional costs to Richmond taxpayers and includes no bonds backed by the City and also includes former Councilmember Recinos stipulations and suggestions regarding the evaluation criteria
2 to 5
To approve the staff report to extend the filing date to February 4, 2019, with the following additional clarifications: There is no restriction on use of Drum Lot 2, although respondents should explain why they need to propose housing or other uses there. There is no prescriptive requirement for affordable housing other than that under our inclusionary zoning ordinance, although respondents should explain how they determined their proposed affordable housing obligation. There is no upper limit on the number of housing units, although exceeding 1,100 would trigger more intense CEQA scrutiny. The City will support infrastructure financing strategies, such as Mello-Roos, Enhanced Infrastructure Financing Districts and others that do not obligate the general fund. There is no prescriptive requirement for a shuttle; just a discussion of a shuttle or other transportation options that do not involve privately owned vehicles and how that might be handled. Keep the evaluation criteria as is in addendum No. 1 with the addition of the following: Quality and creativeness of the proposed plan and design; proposed sales revenue and subsequent tax revenue accruing to the City; and number and type of jobs to be created
4 to 3
Related Items
Meeting Minutes
Mar 17, 2026
Increase housing authority gutter replacement contract by $322,000 due to hidden damage
Mar 17, 2026
Pay $36,000 in overdue landscaping bills for emergency tree removal at public housing
Mar 3, 2026
Increase loan to $10.3 million for Civic Center homeless housing project
Feb 17, 2026
Increase loan to $10.3 million for motel conversion to homeless housing
Feb 17, 2026
Receive presentation on banning corporate purchases of residential properties
Feb 3, 2026
Hire 13 financial consulting firms to analyze real estate deals and development projects
Jan 6, 2026
Authorize $500,000 contracts for on-call financial consulting services
Jan 6, 2026
Increase contract with development advisor by $160,000 for Homekey housing project oversight
Sep 16, 2025
Increase 2 contracts for housing project oversight and wireless permit reviews
Sep 16, 2025